Jackson v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
William Jackson (“Jackson”) initially sued the Illinois Prisoner Review Board and its individual members (collectively (“Board”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), asserting their violation of:
1. the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process of law guaranty and
2. the prohibition against ex post facto laws (U.S. Const. Art. I, sec. 10, cl. 1),
both those claims arising out of Board’s May 1984 denial of Jackson’s parole. This Court’s March 14, 1986 memorandum opinion and order (the “Opinion,” 631 F.Supp. 150) granted Board’s motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- William Jackson v. Illinois Prisoner Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988