Legal Opinion

Street v. Glorence Building Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1959No. Civ. 24079PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while operating a freight elevator in defendant Du Boef's building. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, Du Boef made a motion for nonsuit, which was granted. Plaintiff has appealed from the ensuing judgment.

-[1] In reviewing a judgment of nonsuit, an appellate court must view- the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, disregarding all contradictions, conflicts and inconsistencies and drawing only such inferences as may be reasonably drawn in favor of plaintiff. (Qottloeb v. Melrose Health Baths,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Johnston v. De La Guerra Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Fisher v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Tire & Rubber Company v. DarnellMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  2. O'Keefe v. South End Rowing ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Beeston v. LampasonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Hoffmann v. Young 8/29/SC Case DetailsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API