State v. Miller
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR tb the Franklin Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.
The indictment in this case charges, that the defendant kept a room “ to be used and occupied for gambling.” The defendant moved the Court to quash the indictment. The motion was sustained, and the defendant discharged.
The prosecution is founded on a statute which provides, that “ if any person or persons shall keep a room, building, arbor, booth, shed, or tenement, to be used and occupied for *503gambling, or if any person or persons, being the owner of any room, &c., shall rent the same to be used and occupied for gambling, the person or persons so offending shall, on conviction thereof, be…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by10 opinions
- McLaughlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- State v. NolandIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Sowle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Chase v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
- Howard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.