Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1841PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR tb the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

The indictment in this case charges, that the defendant kept a room “ to be used and occupied for gambling.” The defendant moved the Court to quash the indictment. The motion was sustained, and the defendant discharged.

The prosecution is founded on a statute which provides, that “ if any person or persons shall keep a room, building, arbor, booth, shed, or tenement, to be used and occupied for *503gambling, or if any person or persons, being the owner of any room, &c., shall rent the same to be used and occupied for gambling, the person or persons so offending shall, on conviction thereof, be…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. State v. NolandIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Sowle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Chase v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
  5. Howard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API