Legal Opinion

Criswell v. Wright

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided July 28, 2021No. 4:21-cv-00537Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION PAUL CRISWELL PLAINTIFF v. No: 4:21-cv-00537-JM-PSH RODNEY WRIGHT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is a motion filed by Plaintiff Paul Criswell (“Plaintiff”) asking the Court to reconsider an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris denying his motion proceed as a class action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (Doc. No. 15). Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED; he has not met the requirements for class certification. “One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Oxendine v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  3. Irving v. DormireCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Karl Ebert v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. Allnew v. City of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API