Luton v. Sharp
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Ejectment. Defendants bring error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
This is ejectment.
On April 9, 1890, Daniel E. Soper was the ‘ owner in-fee of the lots in question, and on that date conveyed the-same by warranty deed to Mary A. Soper, his wife, but. *203said deed was not recorded until May 11, 1891. On June-14, 1890, an execution in favor of plaintiff’s assignor, and against the goods and chattels, lands §nd tenements, of Daniel E. Soper, was levied upon the right, title, and interest of said Soper in said lots, and on the same day a. notice of levy was filed with the register of deeds, but at the time of the filing of said notice the execution creditor-had no…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hunt Trust Estate v. KikerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Pugh v. HighleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Bryce v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Campbell v. KeysMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Citizens' Bank v. HeywardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.