Bruce Angelo Evans v. State of Indiana

VAIDIK, Chief Judge.

Case Summary

[1] A confidential informant performed a controlled buy of heroin from the defendant, Bruce Angelo Evans. At the jury trial, several witnesses who had been present in the house where the controlled buy occurred or who were otherwise associated with- Evans and the confidential informant testified that Evans had also sold them heroin on the day of the controlled buy. On appeal, Evans argues first that in light of the evidence of multiple acts of dealing, the trial court erred in failing to issue an instruction on jury unanimity, in order to ensure that all of the…