Legal Opinion
University National Bank v. Harsh
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 12, 1992No. 91CA0049PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RULAND.
Plaintiff, University National Bank, appeals from the judgment of the trial court allowing defendant, Virginia Harsh, to claim the full $20,000 homestead exemption on a residence. We affirm.
The following facts are not in dispute. Defendant and her now deceased husband owned their residence as joint tenants from 1932 until June of 1982. At that time, they conveyed the property to an individual, who then deeded an undivided one-half interest to the J. Kenneth Harsh Trust and an undivided one-half interest to the Virginia Harsh Trust. Defendant continued to occupy the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re LambertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1983
- Weare v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- Matter of Estate of DodgeColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- McPhee v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Dallemand v. MannonColorado Court of Appeals · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re RomeroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- In Re DickinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- In re SolesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Simon Rodriguez v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of ColoradoBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2018