Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Robertson's Admr.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 24, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

This is an action upon three notes executed to appellee’s intestate by appellant. Appellant filed with and as a part of his.answer a.paper purporting to be a receipt from the decedent of full payment of the notes sued on.

The reply attacked the genuineness of this receipt and a trial of this issue resulted in a verdict and judg*505ment against tbe defendant for tbe amount of tbe notes with interest and costs, and he appeals.

As grounds for a reversal he urges: (1) that the reply was not verified before trial as required by sec. ,527 of the Civil Code and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Andricus' Adm'r v. Pineville Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kelly's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Lane v. LaneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Miller Creek Railroad v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Robertson v. Robertson's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tolly v. ChampionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Harlan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Ware v. SaufleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Vincent v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API