Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 1994No. CR 93-1137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Bryson Jacobs moves (1) for additional time to file her brief and (2) to supplement the record with enhanced tapes, or their transcription, concerning the alleged drug transaction at issue. The State Crime Laboratory was unable to enhance the tapes, and Jacobs now states that a private firm' in Little Rock may be able to accomplish this. The court reporter’s letter is attached to the motion. She states that the tapes were not transcribed by her at trial because they were for the most part unintelligible and inaudible and contained background noises.

The motions are denied, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shawn Trevell Rainer v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022
  2. Nicholas Long v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022
  3. Nicholas Long v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API