Legal Opinion

People v. Morse

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 19, 1989No. 5-87-0482PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Howerton

The State must disclose charges pending against one of its witnesses and must disclose the terms of any deal for leniency for that witness so that a defendant can show bias. Failure to so disclose can deprive a defendant of due process of law as guaranteed by the fifth amendment to the Constitution of the United States, made applicable against the several States by operation of the fourteenth amendment. See, e.g., Brady v. Maryland (1963), 373 U.S. 83, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215, 83 S. Ct. 1194; Napue v. Illinois (1959), 360 U.S. 264, 3 L. Ed. 2d 1217, 79 S. Ct. 1173.

We affirm defendant’s conviction…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Greer v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. People v. CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. MonroeIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. GarciaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API