Legal Opinion

Flaherty v. Maxwell Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1915No. Docket No. 142PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne; Gage J., presiding. Case by Charles Flaherty against the Maxwell Motor Company for slander. Judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff, a minor, by his next friend brought suit against defendant, a corporation, in an action of trespass on the case for slander. Upon the trial of the case, after plaintiff had rested, counsel for defendant made a motion for a directed verdict in its behalf upon the ground that there was no evidence in the case to warrant the court in submitting the question of defendant’s liability to the jury. This motion was granted, and a verdict of no cause of action was directed by the court in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. Plaintiff excepted to such direction of the court. Upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Behre v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Stewart Dry Goods Co. v. HeuchtkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Poledna v. Bendix Aviation Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Roemer v. Jacob Schmidt Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Vowles v. YakishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Robertson v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API