Legal Opinion

State v. Conyer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2017No. 16 MA 0021Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Conyer,

2017-Ohio-9046.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, ) CASE NO. 16 MA 0021 ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, ) ) VS. ) OPINION AND ) JUDGMENT ENTRY MAURICE CONYER, ) ) DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ) CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Application to Reopen Appeal App.R. 26(B) JUDGMENT: Affirmed. APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellee: Atty. Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecutor Atty. Ralph M. Rivera Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 21 West Boardman Street, 6th Floor Youngstown, Ohio 44503 For Defendant-Appellant: Maurice Conyer, pro se #692-629…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API