Legal Opinion

The N. & W. No. 2

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 2, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit against a tug to recover for tbe loss of ber tow.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

This action ⅛ for tbe loss of tbe barge Crockett and ber cargo from grounding by tbe alleged negligence of tbe tug wbicb bad ber in tow. On February 11, 1899, at 11 a. m., tbe steam tug 27. and W. 27o. 2 arrived off Sandy Hook. Sbe had in tow tbe David Crockett, converted from a ship into a barge, and after ber was tbe barge N. and W. No. 4, both laden with coal. Tbe Crockett was 218.8 feet in length, 41 feet in breadth, and 27 in depth, and drew 24 feet, while the barge 27. and W. 27o. 2 drew 19 feet of water. Tbe hawser between the Crockett and tbe tug was 200 fathoms…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. The C. W. MillsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1915
  2. The Robert H. CookDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1928
  3. The DorisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API