Stallings v. City of Jacksonville

RAWLS, Judge.

A broadside challenge to the constitutional application of the City’s Housing Code is sought by appellants Stallings, et al. However, as the trial court so aptly found in its final judgments dismissing appellants’ complaints with prejudice, three issues were presented and considered, viz:

“(1) Whether the requirement by the Jacksonville Housing Code, page 506, section 304.13, requiring the installation of screen doors is capricious and arbitrary and a violation of their police powers.

“(2) Whether the Jacksonville Housing Code, page 906, section 306.5 that requires owners of…