Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Louis v. Hansen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 8, 1928Published

1ConcurrenceKindig, J.

(specially concurring). I agree with the result reached by the. majority in the above and foregoing opinion, but find myself impelled to disagree with part of the discussion adopted as a vehicle to carry them to their final conclusion.

It seems to me that the case can be disposed of by the use of long and well established principles laid down by this court, without entering new fields of thought or easting disparagement upon the theories embodied in our own pronouncements. Reference here is especially made to the fundamentals given as a distinction between: First, the rights o'f a tenant under…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sheakley v. MechlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. First National Bank of Grand Meadow v. Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Hakes v. NorthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Whiteside v. MorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Kooistra v. GibfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API