People v. Bettencourt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of maintaining a nuisance, to wit,, a place where alcoholic liquors are unlawfully kept for sale. The defendant moved for a new trial, which was denied. The appeal is from the order denying the motion for new trial, and also from the judgment of conviction.
The first point made for reversal is that the court erred in its instructions on the subject of reasonable doubt, in that it did not give to the jury the instruction found in the case of Commonwealth v. Webster, 5 Cush. (Mass.) 320 [52 Am. Dec. 711], This contention is partly true, but it overlooks…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. MehraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. MuellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. FrankovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People v. MedalgiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. EmmettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933