Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lawrence

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1936No. 24905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

I. The ground of attachment that the defendant is actually removing or about to remove beyond the limits of the county is applicable to a corporation which is domiciled within the county. Lawrence v. Lee’s Department Store, 48 Ga. App. 271 (172 S. E. 471). Where a mercantile corporation does business in one county and has its principal office and place of business, and therefore its domicile or residence in that county (Sprinkle v. Southern Empress Co., 141 Ga. 21, 80 S. E. 288), but where all the officers of the corporation reside in another county and the corporation has decided to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sprinkle Distilling Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Lawrence v. Lee's Department StoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API