Legal Opinion

Interstate Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Walnut Hosiery Mills, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1951No. 3819PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

This is an action for damages for an alleged breach of contract. Requisite jurisdictional facts have been alleged. Pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.'C.A. the defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency -of statement.

The complaint, which consists of two counts, alleges that plaintiff is a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business in New York, N. Y.; and that the defendant, a hosiery manufacturer, is a Pennsylvania corporation, with its principal place of business in Shamokin, Pennsylvania.

The first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. Hollidge v. Gussow, Kahn & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Electric Co. v. Central Transit Warehouse Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API