Legal Opinion

In re Huebner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1954No. 28,896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlanagan, J.

Pursuant to the rules of this court, Information in Revocation of Admission to Practice Law as an Attorney was filed and referred to the Disciplinary Commission, Charles C. Baker, Wilbur F. Dassel, Robert H. Moore, Charles E. Bielby, and James R. Newkirk. The duly appointed Commissioner, Honorable Alvin F. Marsh, has reported, after hearing, recommending that the name of Carl A. Huebner be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before this court.

Upon careful examination of the record, we find that the report of the Commissioner is sustained by the evidence and should be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bynum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. WOODMAR REALTY COMPANY v. McLEANCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  2. Woodmar Realty Co. v. McLeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  3. Bynum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API