Parker v. Worcester Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
The uncontradicted evidence establishes these facts: On February 26, 1962, defendant’s authorized agent delivered to plaintiffs a policy of insurance. This policy insured plaintiffs “against all DIRECT Loss BY FlEE, LIGHTNING AND BY REMOVAL FROM PREMISES ENDANGERED BY TI-IE PERILS INSURED AGAINST IN THIS POLICY, EXCEPT as Hereinafter Peovided, to the property described herein while located or contained as described in this policy, or pro rata for five days at each proper place to which any of the property shall necessarily be removed for preservation from the perils insured against in this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rosenthal v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Georgia Auto & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Peony Park, Inc. v. Security InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
- Southern Underwriters v. Williams Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Hines v. Home Insurance Company of New YorkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- North Carolina Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975