Legal Opinion
Kimball v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 12, 2001No. 4D00-1095PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
801 So.2d 264 (2001)
Gregory KIMBALL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D00-1095.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
December 12, 2001.
Glenn H. Mitchell, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gary K. Milligan, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
STONE, J.
Kimball's conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ecstacy, is reversed. Upon a de novo review of the record[1], we conclude that it was error to deny the defense motion to suppress physical evidence seized in the search of Kimball's…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marsdin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- State v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- State v. OrregoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- State v. OrregoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Whittle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005