Legal Opinion
Poloha v. Rumane
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 12, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis and reported at 137 N. J. Eq. 167.
For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, McLean, Sciiettino, JJ. 11. For reversal — Heiier, Freund, McGeehan, JJ. 3.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Klockner v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Naimo v. La FianzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Young v. SabolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950