Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. Vandenburg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 2002No. WD 61262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.

At issue in this appeal is whether a party can appeal by means of trial de novo the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment by the small claims division of the circuit court. The issue arose after the small claims division entered a default judgment against Jack and Mary Vanden-burg. Over 100 days later, they asked the small claims division, in a motion filed under Rule 74.05(d), to set aside the default judgment, but the court denied their request.

The Vandenburgs then sought the circuit court’s de novo review by asking the circuit court to consider their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Popular Leasing USA, Inc. v. Universal Art Corp. of New YorkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Moore v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. American Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. MorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McElroy v. Eagle Star Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In Re the Marriage of CoontsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Russell Clark and Bart Mantia v. Gregory KinseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Spino v. BhaktaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API