Quackenbush v. Quackenbush
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, C. J.
Plaintiff is a son of the defendants and this case arises out of the failure of these, parties to have a definite understanding as to their respective rights in a 20-acre piece of real estate. As a result, plaintiff filed this bill in chancery seeking to enjoin the defendants from further prosecution of summary proceedings to oust plaintiff from possession; and to compel defendants to convey this property to plaintiff. The defendants filed a cross bill claiming that plaintiff had failed to comply with the terms of a contract under which defendants were to convey said premises (incorrectly…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
- Cullum v. Topps-Stillman's, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1965
- Dillon v. YankeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Timm v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Martin v. ArndtMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.