Legal Opinion

Quackenbush v. Quackenbush

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1943No. Docket No. 41, Calendar No. 42,331PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, C. J.

Plaintiff is a son of the defendants and this case arises out of the failure of these, parties to have a definite understanding as to their respective rights in a 20-acre piece of real estate. As a result, plaintiff filed this bill in chancery seeking to enjoin the defendants from further prosecution of summary proceedings to oust plaintiff from possession; and to compel defendants to convey this property to plaintiff. The defendants filed a cross bill claiming that plaintiff had failed to comply with the terms of a contract under which defendants were to convey said premises (incorrectly…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Cullum v. Topps-Stillman's, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Dillon v. YankeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Timm v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Martin v. ArndtMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API