Legal Opinion

Texas Real Estate Commission v. Nagle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 14, 1987No. 08-87-00016-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*38OPINION

WOODARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of $50,000.00 against the Real Estate Recovery Fund of the Texas Real Estate Commission. We affirm.

The original defendant, Fontaine Graham, was a licensed real estate broker. She was appointed independent coexecutrix of the estate of Martha A. Neal. The descendents of Martha A. Neal obtained a judgment of $112,797.16 on April 7, 1986, for malfeasance, breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentations and dishonest conduct. The trial court ruled the Real Estate Recovery Fund to be liable for $50,000.00.

Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6573a, sec.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Insurance Commissioners v. Great Southern Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. PGP Gas Products, Inc. v. FarissTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. City of Austin v. Avenue Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Henry S. Miller Co. v. Treo EnterprisesTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pickering v. First Greenville National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas Real Estate Commission v. NagleTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Texas Real Estate Commission v. NagleTexas Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API