Legal Opinion

Albert v. Holt

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 20, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

This is an action of ejectment brought by D. W. Holt and Marvin Holt against Albert to recover nominally *732.91 acres of land, but really sixty-eight square poles, of- the value of less than five dollars: There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, and the defendant assigns error.

The parties claim title under a common source, and the plaintiffs proved a perfect paper title unless one of the deeds in their chain of title is too defective to operate as a conveyance. The defect asserted is that the deed contains no words of conveyance. So much of the deed as needs to be recited is as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harlowe v. HudginsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Flagg v. EamesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867
  3. Berridge v. GlasseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Evenson v. WebsterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Corbett v. RubenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  2. Smith v. BaileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. Burdette v. BRUSH MOUNTAIN ESTATES, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  4. Lim v. Soo Myung ChoiSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  5. White v. LeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API