State v. Williams

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

The defendant, Clarence Williams, having appealed from his conviction and sentence, on a charge by bill of information with possession of heroin, without having reserved or perfected a bill of exception to the only alleged error committed during the trial of the case, i. e., “the denial of a new trial based upon alleged misconduct of *231the prosecution in seeking to impeach a key-defense witness in an unfair manner,” nothing is presented for review by this court except error patent on the face of the record,1 of which, after careful examination we find none.

The conviction…