Rube v. Sullivan
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Cedar county. Tried below before Barnes, J! Smith v. Smith, 34 Kan., 301. State v. O’Laughlin, 19 Id., 504. Thompson Highways, 244. Harlow v. Hwmiston, 6 Cow., 189. Woodyer v. Hadden, 5 Taunt., 137. Logansport v. Bunn, 8 Ind., 378. Scott v. State, 1 Sneed, 629. Harding v. Jasper, 14 Cal., 644. Talmage v. Huntting, 29 N. Y., 447. Cincinnati v. White, 6 Peters, 431. Wilder v. St. Paul, 12 Minn., 116. Mankato v. Warren, 20 Id., 148. Mankato v.…
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Cedar county. Tried below before Barnes, J! Smith v. Smith, 34 Kan., 301. State v. O’Laughlin, 19 Id., 504. Thompson Highways, 244. Harlow v. Hwmiston, 6 Cow., 189. Woodyer v. Hadden, 5 Taunt., 137. Logansport v. Bunn, 8 Ind., 378. Scott v. State, 1 Sneed, 629. Harding v. Jasper, 14 Cal., 644. Talmage v. Huntting, 29 N. Y., 447. Cincinnati v. White, 6 Peters, 431. Wilder v. St. Paul, 12 Minn., 116. Mankato v. Warren, 20 Id., 148. Mankato v. Willard, 13 Id., 17.. Murray v. Butte, 14 Pac. Rep., 656.' Simmons v. Cornell, 1 Rhode Island, 519.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants, to recover damages for the removal of a fence *781from an alleged public road. . The plaintiff alleges in his petition that, “ he is, and was at the time hereinafter mentioned, the owner in fee simple of the following lands and tenements: The south-east quarter of section ten in township 31 of range 2 east, in said county (Cedar), containing 160 acres of land according to government survey, in possession of said plaintiff at the time hereinafter named; that the said tract is inclosed and cultivated lands, and that a good wire,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Noyes v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
- Hoole v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Town of Lewiston v. ProctorIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
- Denning v. RoomeNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Epler v. NimanIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of McCook v. Red Willow CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Brandt v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Kendall-Smith Co. v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Oyler v. RossNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Robison v. GebauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1915