Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fite v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 8, 1994No. F-89-353Published

1Concurrence

LUMPKIN, PRESIDING JUDGE,

specially concurring.

I concur in the opinion of the Court. I write separately to explain what I perceive to be the rationale behind overruling Brown v. State, 314 P.2d 362, 366 (Okl.Cr.1957).

The Court is correct when it observes the right to have a jury help determine sentence *298is guaranteed by statute. The pertinent section reads:

In all cases of a verdict of conviction for any offense against any of the laws of the State of Oklahoma, the jury may, and shall upon the request of the defendant assess and declare the punishment in their verdict within the limitations…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Champeau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API