Legal Opinion
Culpepper & Carroll, PLLC v. Cole
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 9, 2005No. 39,438-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJjPEATROSS, J.
In this dispute over attorney fees under an alleged contingent fee contract, Defendant, Connie D. Cole, proceeding pro se in this appeal,, argues that insufficient, evidence existed to support the trial court’s decision to award Plaintiff, Culpepper & Carroll, PLLC, the sum of $6,950.01, plus legal interest, together with an additional 25 percent on principal and interest as attorney fees. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is amended and, as amended, affirmed.
FACTS
On April 12, 2004, Culpepper & Carroll, PLLC (“Culpepper”), filed a petition on open account in Ruston…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Lisa Lockette, Pamela Lockette v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Fredric Hayes, Inc. v. RollinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- In Re Succession of BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Tschirn v. Secor BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
3Cited by1 opinion
- Culpepper & Carroll, PLLC v. ColeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006