Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Rehm

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1901No. Appeal, No. 181Published

Appeal, No. 181, Oct. T., 1900, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lancaster Co., June T., 1900, No. 40, on case stated in suit of Annie M. Hinkle v. W. C. Rehm. Case stated to determine marketable title to real estate.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 181, Oct. T., 1900, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lancaster Co., June T., 1900, No. 40, on case stated in suit of Annie M. Hinkle v. W. C. Rehm. Case stated to determine marketable title to real estate. From the case stated it appeared that the land in question formerly belonged to Annie M. C. Hinkle who died on November 24, 1884, leaving a will by which she devised the land to her husband, Franklin Hinkle, M. D. Franklin Hinkle subsequently married plaintiff, Annie M. Hinkle, and on October 26, 1892, Franklin Hinkle and Annie M. Hinkle conveyed the land to Houston Mifflin.…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

A case stated was submitted in the court below, involving the construction of the following clause in the will of Annie M. O. Hinkle: “ Item. All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, whether real, personal or mixed, of which I shall die possessed or to which I shall be entitled at my decease and over which I have any power of control or disposition under the will of my said deceased father or otherwise, I give, devise and bequeath to my beloved husband, Franklin Hinkle, M. D., to have and to hold the said estate, with the rents, issues and profits thereof, during…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Appeal of HinkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  2. Forsythe v. ForsytheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API