Legal Opinion

Daughdrill v. Ocean Drilling and Exploration Co.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 7, 1989No. Civ. A. 85-5559PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER & REASONS

MENTZ, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of defendant, Trico Marine, Inc., for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, for reconsideration, or alternatively, for a new trial. The Court, after carefully reviewing the memoranda submitted by counsel and the applicable law, finds that Trico’s arguments are without merit and denies Trico’s motion for the reasons set forth below.

Trico’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, for a new trial is based, in part, on a causation argument. Trico believes that there was insufficient evidence for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Perry v. Stewart Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. John Robinson v. Showa Kaiun K. K., American Commercial Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Foster v. Destin Trading Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Miller v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Miller v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Stowe v. Moran Towing Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
  5. Smith v. Basic Marine Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API