Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Gentry

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’HARA, Justice.

This matter comes to this court on a direct transfer from the judgment of the Fayette Circuit Court dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint. The original action grows out of an existing partnership relationship in which the appellant (plaintiff) J.D. Marsh sought an accounting by reason of sale of thoroughbred stock by the appellee (defendant) Tom Gentry to himself. The appellant alleges a conversion and actual damages. The trial court found for the defendant Gentry, and in an amended conclusions of law, deferred the issue of an accounting until an appeal could be had. We reverse…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ehrmann v. StitzelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Van Hooser v. KeenonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  3. Smith v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grossman v. GreenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Marsh v. GentryKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Monin v. MoninCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API