Legal Opinion

Garnica-Vasquez v. Reno

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided March 12, 1999No. EP-98-CA-397-DRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BRIONES, District Judge.

On this day, the Court considered Janet Reno, Attorney General; Doris Meissner, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service; and Immigration and Naturalization Service’s (collectively, “Respondents”) Motion to Dismiss filed on November 25, 1998, by leave of Court, in the above-captioned cause. Raul Eulalio Garnica-Vasquez (“Petitioner”) filed his Response on January 7, 1999. After due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be granted for the reasons that follow.

FACTS

Petitioner, a native and citizen of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte: Blanca Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  2. Ex Parte: Blanca Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  3. Ex Parte: Manuel Torres, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API