Legal Opinion

Barrist v. John Wanamaker Philadelphia, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1965No. Appeal, No. 107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

In 1956, Lonis Barrist, trading and doing business as the National Collection Office, the plaintiff-appellant herein, entered into oral agreement with the authorized employees of John Wanamaker Philadelphia, Incorporated, the defendant-appellee. The agreement provided that the John Wanamaker Store would submit a portion of its delinquent accounts receivable to the appellant. The appellant would then commence collection procedures and would be paid a percentage fee, contingent on collection. The arrangement continued (with some changes in fees and procedures)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Penneys v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. United Mercantile Agencies v. SlotskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Helmig v. Rockwell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jenkins Towel Service v. Tidewater Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Jenkins Towel Service v. Tidewater Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API