Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Phillips.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2016No. SCWC-12-0000020Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

NAKAYAMA, J.,

IN WHICH RECKTENWALD, C.J., JOINS

This appeal concerns the admissibility of a hammer found in plain view in Defendant Lincoln Phillips’ (Phillips) garage, the admissibility of bloody clothing that Phillips secreted in a trash can inside his garage, and the propriety of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit’s (circuit court) restitution order. I would hold that Phillips consented to an initial search of his garage when he called 911 and admitted first responders into his home. This view follows the unanimous approach taken by state appellate…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API