Legal Opinion

Faubion Jr., Marcus E. v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided June 13, 2002No. 14-01-00748-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SCOTT BRISTER, Chief Justice.

Appellant Marcus E. Faubion, Jr. appeals from the attorney’s fee portion of a judgment in a disciplinary action entered against him. For the reasons stated below, we affirm. Because all dispositive issues are clearly settled in law, we issue this memorandum opinion. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.1.

The facts of this appeal are known to the parties, so we do not recite them here. The trial court’s order included a sanction assessing $13,200 in attorney’s fees against appellant. See Tex.R. Disoip. P. 1.06(T)(8)(b). He argues the Commission could not recover…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matthews v. Land Tool Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. WorldPeace v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. John Worldpeace v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. Sandra Hale v. Rising S Company, LLC, Gary Lynch, Clyde Wayne Scott, in Their Individual and Official Capacities, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API