Royal Indemnity Co. v. Independence Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
Upon sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, the court below entered a judgment of dismissal, from which the plaintiff appeals.
From the complaint and exhibits attached thereto it appears that in districts designated as Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the city of Reeds-port, Or., projected certain street improve*44ments, involving, among other things, the making of fills. At the same time the port of Umpqua was desirous of having deepened a section of the Umpqua river channel, and' as suitable equipment for such work it was the owner of a suction dredge, derrick, scow, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parker v. JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Electric Appliance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Brick Co. v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- American Surety Co. v. Small Quarries Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Philip Carey Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of University City Ex Rel. MacKey v. Frank Miceli & Sons Realty & Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961