Legal Opinion
Demissie v. Starbucks Corporate Office & Headquarters
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 13, 2015No. Civil Action No. 13-2002 (ESH)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Rahel A. Demissie filed this action on December 18, 2013, against Star- ■ bucks Corporate Office and Headquarters (“Starbucks”) based on a claim of unlawful employment actions motivated by discrimination on the basis of race, gender, or national origin. (See Compl., Dec. 18, 2013 [ECF. No. 1].) The parties engaged in a lengthy series of settlement conferences under the auspices of Magistrate Judge Robinson, but they disagree on whether a settlement was reached during a settlement conference held on November 6, 2014.
*31Pl…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- EastBanc, Inc. v. Georgetown Park Associates II, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Duffy v. DuffyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- United States v. Alaw (P. Mahoney)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Steven R. Perles PC v. Kagy, Anne MarieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Azima v. RAK Inv. Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Azima v. Rak Investment AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Bussman v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Cogan v. ScottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Colorado Wild Public Lands v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.