Legal Opinion
Inland Empire Waterkeeper v. Corona Clay Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 5, 2026No. 24-6199Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INLAND EMPIRE No. 24-6090 WATERKEEPER, a project of D.C. No. Orange County Coastkeeper; 8:18-cv-00333- ORANGE COUNTY DOC-DFM COASTKEEPER, a California non- profit corporation, Plaintiffs - Appellees, OPINION v. CORONA CLAY COMPANY, a California corporation, Defendant - Appellant. INLAND EMPIRE No. 24-6199 WATERKEEPER; ORANGE D.C. No. COUNTY COASTKEEPER, 8:18-cv-00333- DOC-DFM Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CORONA CLAY COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. 2 INLAND EMPIRE WATERKEEPER V. CORONA CLAY CO. Appeal from the United States…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.