Legal Opinion
Cherney v. Matawan Borough Zoning Bd. of Adj.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 18, 1987PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
221 N.J. Super. 141 (1987)
534 A.2d 41
FRANK AND MARY CHERNEY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
MATAWAN BOROUGH ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 6, 1987.
Decided November 18, 1987.
Before Judges ANTELL, DEIGHAN and R.S. COHEN.
Lynne Andreades argued the cause for appellant (Foley, Shelly & Niemann, attorneys).
Stanley Yacker argued the cause for respondents (Yacker & Granata, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by R.S. COHEN, J.A.D.
Plaintiffs Frank and Mary Cherney own a home in a single-family residential district…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Urban v. Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Atlantic Container v. Township of Eagleswood Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Motley v. Borough of Seaside Park Zoning Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- COLTS RUN CIVIC v. Colts Neck Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Ientile, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.