Legal Opinion

Foster v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 22, 1974PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEINFELD, Justice.

Appellant Ruby Foster was tried for the crime of breaking and entering, KRS 433.-190, together with being an habitual criminal KRS 431.190. A motion that the habitual criminal charge be tried separately from the primary charge was denied. Evidence showed that Foster had been convicted of felonies twice before. The jury, pursuant to an option given to it by the court’s instructions, found Foster guilty of the primary offense and of being an habitual criminal. The court fixed his punishment at life imprisonment. He appeals. We affirm.

Sometime after midnight on August 7, 1972,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hartsock v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Franklin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  3. Hardin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  4. Smith v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  5. Wahl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Knappenberger v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Prince v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  3. Huff v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Davidson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lovell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API