Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Sterling Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 29, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My judgment is that the complaint should be dismissed without costs.

I. The situation involved in this case goes back to August 13,1931, when what is called a financial statement contract was entered into by the defendant bank and the M & M Manufacturing Company, Ine., of which the plaintiff is a trustee in bankruptcy.

This contract, so far as it is material, reads as follows (italics mine):

“The undersigned (called Borrower) to procure credit or loans from time to time from Sterling National Bank & Trust Company (called Bank) on negotiable paper or otherwise hereby…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Benedict v. RatnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Kolkman v. Manufacturers' Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. In re M. J. Hoey & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  4. Samuels v. Public National Bank & Trust Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Updike v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Beverwyck Breweries, Inc. v. AdelsbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API