Legal Opinion

Inzeo v. Inzeo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), entered April 7, 1994, as, after a nonjury trial, awarded custody of the parties’ two children to the defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

There is a sound and substantial basis in the record for the trial court’s custody award. Therefore, the trial court’s determination will not be disturbed on appeal (see, Crum v Crum, 122 AD2d 771; cf., Matter of King v King, 166 AD2d 750;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crum v. CrumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Setty v. KoenekeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API