Legal Opinion

Robertson & Son v. New Orleans, Texas & Mexico Ry. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 1928No. 10,366PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

The defendant railroad company is Sued for the value of three mules killed by its trains.

Plaintiff relies upon Act 70 of 1886 which places the burden upon railroads of disproving negligence in the killing of livestock by locomotives. Act 110 of 1886 relieves railroads of this burden when fences are maintained along the right-of-way.

There was a fence erected along defendant’s right-of-way where the mules were killed but it does not appear to have been in good condition and gates in the fence are shown to have been left open by someone, whether the fault be with the defendant in this respect is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mongogna v. Illinois Cent. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Foster v. T. & P. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Bailey v. Texas & Pacific RailroadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Abraham v. Texas P. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API