Legal Opinion

Bates v. Betty & Ross Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 29, 2010No. 3D09-2071PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSuarez, J.

The appellant (“Paul Bates”) appeals a non-final order terminating arbitration. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv). We reverse the order terminating arbitration and remand for further proceedings, finding that the Arbitration Agreement in question requires arbitration of the facts contained in the Amended Claim and, even if not, we find that the parties were collaterally estopped from raising the issue before the trial court.

This arbitration matter arose from the filing of a civil complaint for damages against the appellees, The Betty & Ross Co., a dissolved…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Department Hrs v. BjmSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. DADELAND DEPOT. v. St. Paul Fire and MarineSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  4. Beverly Hills v. George Wimpey of Fla., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Waterhouse Const. Group v. 5891 Sw 64th St.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crowley Mar. Corp. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburg, PADistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2018
  2. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
  3. YECHIEL BARON v. L.P. EVANS MOTORS WPB, INC., etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API