Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Creighton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1917No. 8705PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

This cause comes before us on error to the Court of Appeals which reversed the judgment of the District Court, one member of the court dissenting. 27 Colo. App. 120.

The plaintiff in error was plaintiff below in an action for damages alleged to have been received because of the purchase of stock in the Manitou Bathing Company on fraudulent misrepresentations, of all of which the defendant is charged with having had notice when he bought a controlling interest in the company.

*480The complaint' in this cause is very voluminous, setting up, among other things in addition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ruby Chief Mining & Milling Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  2. Denver, Texas & Fort Worth Railroad v. SmockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  3. Drake v. Justice Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. HepnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Rupp v. RuppColorado Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ackmann v. Merchants Mortgage & Trust Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Conner v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Werner v. NordenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Jackson v. TrainorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  5. Kaufman v. Guest Capital, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API