Slaughter's v. Caldwell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Affirming.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether or not an executor, who was the sole beneficiary under the will of which he was executor, is entitled to he allowed, out of the estate, counsel fees expended by him in the defense of a contest brought to break such will on the grounds of mental incapacity and undue influence, in which contest the contestants were successful. The facts relative to such will contest here involved may be found in the case of Beatty v. Caldwell, 210 Ky. 559, 276 S. W. 547. Although this precise question does not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goode v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Shields v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Louisville Trust Co. v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Beatty v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Trevathan's v. Dees' ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Douglas' Administrator v. Douglas'Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Creason v. CreasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Daly v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Estate of McCoy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961