Interstate Life & Accident Co. v. Shedrick
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
1. “Accord and satisfaction is where the parties, by a subsequent agreement, have satisfied the former one, and the latter agreement has been executed. The execution of a new agreement may itself amount to a satisfaction, where it is so expressly agreed by the parties; and without such agreement, if the new promise is founded on a new consideration, the taking of it is a satisfaction of the former contract.” Code, § 20-1201. “The accord and satisfaction must be of some advantage, legal or equitable, to the creditor, or it will not have the effect of barring him from his legal rights. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gibson v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Petty v. Brunswick & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Burgamy v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Redmond & Co. v. Atlanta & Birmingham Air-Line RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Butler v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Guaranty Life Insurance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Georgia Power Company v. RoperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Davis v. Zaban Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939