Hill v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
COCHRAN, J.,
filed a dissenting opinion
in which HOLCOMB, J., joined.
I respectfully dissent. First, I believe that appellant failed to produce evidence to support his double jeopardy claim. Second, I do not believe that a trial judge is required to proceed with eleven jurors under article 36.29(a) if a juror becomes disabled, rather he has discretion to declare a mistrial for manifest necessity.
I
The record shows that the parties picked a jury in this non-death penalty capital murder case on November 10th. The jury was sworn in at noon and told to return at 9:00 a.m. the next day for the start…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.