Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 2002No. 1385-01Published

1Dissent

COCHRAN, J.,

filed a dissenting opinion

in which HOLCOMB, J., joined.

I respectfully dissent. First, I believe that appellant failed to produce evidence to support his double jeopardy claim. Second, I do not believe that a trial judge is required to proceed with eleven jurors under article 36.29(a) if a juror becomes disabled, rather he has discretion to declare a mistrial for manifest necessity.

I

The record shows that the parties picked a jury in this non-death penalty capital murder case on November 10th. The jury was sworn in at noon and told to return at 9:00 a.m. the next day for the start…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API